Leah and I once had a conversation, or rather several about the public nature of writing, about how writers must be fearless in their writing, especially non-fiction. How could you write honestly about people you care about without offending someone you care about or revealing too much personal shit about friends and family that could potentially be read by a large amount of people? In the times of YouTube and blogs and camera phones, our lives are being perpetually published on the internet and sent out into the world for complete strangers to view or read. When print first came out, it took a machine the size of a house to make a book. Now "publishing" in the rough sense of the word is as easy as moving some fingers in the correct pattern on a machine that fits on your lap, warming it like a cat.
I learned recently that Brett and Jenny both have blogs and Brett is a bit more personal in his writing. It reminded me of the small writing assigned by pacifist professor Mike Heller. The only class Brett and I had together was a very revealing class. People wrote, occasionally, from their personal experiences. One girl wrote about coming down from cocaine addiction. I wrote once about the time day my mom told me she was leaving my dad. My pre-adolescent fredom cut short by the abrupt statement riding with my mom in her green Ford Astrostar mini-van on the deserted plains of a nature preserve somewhere in Pittsylvania County where my friend Jonathan lived. These stories feel personal, but once I sat in the class full of people who had read the story, hearing their compliments, I knew that it wasn't mine anymore. It existed in the 15 or so students and one teacher who had read it. How can a writer deal with that? What would my mom think if she knew that all of those people knew about one of the hardest moments for her? I was tempted after I had written it to give a copy of it to her. I could see her finishing it and crying. But I think I decided that she has enough to cry about without bringing up shit from the past.
I guess that's why authors hide behind fictional characters. They can ger away with being honest because it's not really them who has these thoughts, or does these things. I think that Brett, Jenny and I should continue the Heller tradion of doing small writings occasionally. I mean, we all have blogs. We could write them in our private time, post them, post comments about each others writings and talk about them. I realized from working a first grade classroom how much those kids create. Everyday of their lives, their asked to use their imaginations, using all media imaginable. Write a story about a trip to the north pole, draw a picture of a tiger in the jungle, write a play and create characters using different kinds of puppets. Adults are lucky to write even one sentence that causes them to use their imagination per week. The only time adults are creative is when they dream and how often do remember what our subconscious has created? What if adults made art as often as kids. how much more great art we would have and how much more imaginative would we be? I think at some point we just stop needing the praise from our teachers; we stopped trying to impress anyone with our creativity and started needing sex and acceptance from our peers more. Contrary to popular belief, creative writing and drawing pictures is not normally accepted as cool. But the praise of a teacher for a first grader is like having god give you a thumbs up.
I guess what I'm saying is that I want/need some kind of structure, or even feedback about my writing. I've been out of school for two years, after having been in school for the past 17 years of my life. I haven't gotten a grade for two years and it just feels weird. I feel like I'm letting my mind go to mush after writing hundreds of pages for professors and teachers and now I'm lucky if I can write two pages on a blog. But what if I just started writing all of the things I think? Fully aware of the fact that, chances are, nobody really cares and nobody is going to read it. Brett's blog posts read like an opinion column in a newspaper or magazine. Funny, topical, inciteful, personal, but not bleeding. He has a way of writing things more for an audience. I mean, I write for an audience, but while I was writing in Europe, I knew my audience was Reid, Brett, Jenny and Leah. But he didn't even give me his blog address. He's writing more for the masses. A way to pass the time at work, yes, but also a way of writing about all of the rediculous things he sees or reads about in the world in a way that he could never vocalize around anyone.
A resolve to take writng more seriously, do it more often and share it more with people. Maybe I'll type up my journals from Europe. In other words, Writing is Being. Well done, Mike. Thanks.